 |
Index for Section 5 |
|
 |
Alphabetical listing for N |
|
 |
Bottom of page |
|
NOTIFY(5)
NAME
NOTIFY - generate a notification
SYNOPSIS
NOTIFY name
DESCRIPTION
The NOTIFY command sends a notification event to each client application
that has previously executed LISTEN name for the specified notification
name in the current database.
The information passed to the client for a notification event includes the
notification name and the notifying session's server process PID. It is up
to the database designer to define the notification names that will be used
in a given database and what each one means.
Commonly, the notification name is the same as the name of some table in
the database, and the notify event essentially means, ``I changed this
table, take a look at it to see what's new''. But no such association is
enforced by the NOTIFY and LISTEN commands. For example, a database
designer could use several different notification names to signal different
sorts of changes to a single table.
NOTIFY provides a simple form of signal or interprocess communication
mechanism for a collection of processes accessing the same PostgreSQL
database. Higher-level mechanisms can be built by using tables in the
database to pass additional data (beyond a mere notification name) from
notifier to listener(s).
When NOTIFY is used to signal the occurrence of changes to a particular
table, a useful programming technique is to put the NOTIFY in a rule that
is triggered by table updates. In this way, notification happens
automatically when the table is changed, and the application programmer
can't accidentally forget to do it.
NOTIFY interacts with SQL transactions in some important ways. Firstly, if
a NOTIFY is executed inside a transaction, the notify events are not
delivered until and unless the transaction is committed. This is
appropriate, since if the transaction is aborted, all the commands within
it have had no effect, including NOTIFY. But it can be disconcerting if one
is expecting the notification events to be delivered immediately. Secondly,
if a listening session receives a notification signal while it is within a
transaction, the notification event will not be delivered to its connected
client until just after the transaction is completed (either committed or
aborted). Again, the reasoning is that if a notification were delivered
within a transaction that was later aborted, one would want the
notification to be undone somehow---but the server cannot ``take back'' a
notification once it has sent it to the client. So notification events are
only delivered between transactions. The upshot of this is that
applications using NOTIFY for real-time signaling should try to keep their
transactions short.
NOTIFY behaves like Unix signals in one important respect: if the same
notification name is signaled multiple times in quick succession,
recipients may get only one notification event for several executions of
NOTIFY. So it is a bad idea to depend on the number of notifications
received. Instead, use NOTIFY to wake up applications that need to pay
attention to something, and use a database object (such as a sequence) to
keep track of what happened or how many times it happened.
It is common for a client that executes NOTIFY to be listening on the same
notification name itself. In that case it will get back a notification
event, just like all the other listening sessions. Depending on the
application logic, this could result in useless work, for example, reading
a database table to find the same updates that that session just wrote out.
It is possible to avoid such extra work by noticing whether the notifying
session's server process PID (supplied in the notification event message)
is the same as one's own session's PID (available from libpq). When they
are the same, the notification event is one's own work bouncing back, and
can be ignored. (Despite what was said in the preceding paragraph, this is
a safe technique. PostgreSQL keeps self-notifications separate from
notifications arriving from other sessions, so you cannot miss an outside
notification by ignoring your own notifications.)
PARAMETERS
name Name of the notification to be signaled (any identifier).
EXAMPLES
Configure and execute a listen/notify sequence from psql:
LISTEN virtual;
NOTIFY virtual;
Asynchronous notification "virtual" received from server process with PID 8448.
COMPATIBILITY
There is no NOTIFY statement in the SQL standard.
SEE ALSO
LISTEN [listen(5)], UNLISTEN [unlisten(l)]
 |
Index for Section 5 |
|
 |
Alphabetical listing for N |
|
 |
Top of page |
|